中国临床心理学杂志

多维状态无聊量表在中国学生中的试用报告

作者：宋皓杰李艺敏李永鑫

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2013,21(5):774-778

摘要：

目的：考察多维状态无聊量表在我国学生样本中的试用情况及其因素结构与信效度。方法：采用方便取样法,选取被试836名,施测多维状态无聊量表、抑郁量表、孤独量表。结果：探索性因素分析表明,中文版多维状态无聊量表包括高唤醒、低唤醒、时间感知、脱离感、注意涣散、感觉寻求六个因素,累计解释方差变异量为57.66%;验证性因素分析结果表明,RMESA=0.05,IFI=0.91,TLI=0.92,CFI=0.91;量表的内部一致性系数与重测信度为0.91和0.86,各分量表的内部一致性系数在0.65到0.80之间,重测信度在0.62到0.71之间,组合信度在0.75到0.86之间;无聊与抑郁、孤独的相关系数分别为0.46,0.50。结论：中文版多维状态无聊量表具有良好的信效度,可以在中国文化背景下应用。

Objective: To explore the reliability and validity of Multidimensional State Boredom Scale(MSBS) in Chinese students. Methods: A sample of 836 students was tested with measuring scales including Multidimensional State Boredom Scale(MSBS), Self-Rating Depression Scale(SDS), and State Loneliness Scale(SLS). Results: Exploratory factor analysis extracted six factors including high arousal, low arousal, time perception, disengagement, inattention, sensation seeking and the cumulative variance accounts was 57.66%. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated that six-factor model had better fitting indices(RMESA=0.05, IFI=0.91, TLI=0.92, CFI=0.91). The internal consistencies of the MSBS and its subscales were 0.65 to 0.91. The test-retest reliabilities were 0.62 to 0.86. The composite reliabilities of subscales were0.75 to 0.86. The correlation coefficients among depression, loneliness with boredom were 0.46, 0.50. Conclusion: Chinese Version of MSBS has satisfactory validity and reliability and can be used under the background of Chinese culture.

基金项目：

河南省高校科技创新人才(人文社科类)资助项目(教社科[2013]404号)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 周浩，王琦，董妍. 无聊：一个久远而又新兴的研究主题.心理科学进展，2012，1：98-107
2 Vodanovich SJ. Psychometric measures of boredom: A re-view of the literature. Journal of Psychology, 2003, 137(6):569-595
3 Vodanovich SJ, Kass SJ. A factor analytic study of the bore-dom proneness scale. Journal of Personality Assessment,1990, 55(1/2): 115-123
4 Watt J, Hargis M. Boredom proneness: Its relationship withsubjective underemployment, perceived organizational sup-port, and job performance. Journal of Business and Psycho-logy, 2010, 25(1): 163-174
5 Sommers J, Vodanovich SJ. Boredom proneness: Its relation-ship to psychological and physical-health symptoms. Jour-nal of Clinical Psychology, 2000, 56(1): 149-155
6 耿柳娜，钱伯建，沈晖. 毒品复吸高危量表的初步修订. 中国临床心理学杂志，2010，18(3)：300-303
7 Loukidou L, Loan-Clarke J, Daniels K. Boredom in theworkplace: More than monotonous tasks. International Jour-nal of Management Reviews, 2009, 11(4): 381-405
8 Abdolahi B, Damirchi GV, Ganjeh H. Surveying of job bor-edom proneness effect on job satisfaction and job involve-ment. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Researchin Business, 2011, 3(3): 1332-1338
9 黄时华，张卫，胡谏萍. “无聊”的心理学研究述评. 华南师范大学学报 ( 社会科学版 )，2011，4：133-139
10 黄时华，李冬玲，张卫，等. 大学生无聊倾向问卷的初步编制. 心理发展与教育，2010，3：308-314
11 Fahlman SA, Mercer-Lynn KB, Flora DB, et al. Develop-ment and validation of the multidimensional state boredomscale. Assessment, 2013, 20(1): 68-85
12 汪向东，王希林，马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册. 中国心理卫生杂志社，1999. 191-287
13 张光楠，周仁来. 情绪对注意范围的影响动机程度的调节作用. 心理与行为研究，2013，11(3)：30-36
14 吴明隆. 结构方程模型— Amos 的操作与应用. 重庆大学出版社，2009. 467-472
15 Martin M, Sadlo G, Stew G. The phenomenon of boredom.Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006, 3(3): 193-211
16 Fredrickson BL. The broaden-and-build theory of positiveemotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society:Biological Sciences, 2004,359: 1367-1377
17 Gable PA, Harmon-Jones E. Approach-motivated positiveaffect reduce broadening of attention. Psychological Science,2008, 19(5): 476-492
18 Watt JD, Vodanovich SJ. Boredom proneness and psychoso-cial development.The Journal of Psychology, 1999, 133(2):303-314
19 Fisher CD. Boredom at work: A neglected concept. HumanRelations, 1993, 46(3): 395-417

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】