中国临床心理学杂志

权力刻板印象及自我卷入的影响

作者：张珊明¹ 2 罗伏生² 钟毅平¹ 陈芸¹

单位：1. 湖南师范大学心理系长沙 410081
2. 中南林业科技大学心理健康教育研究中心长沙 410004

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2013,21(5):751-753

摘要：

目的：探讨中国文化背景下权力刻板印象的特点及自我卷入对权力刻板印象的影响。方法：以128名成人为被试,采用实证研究的方法,探究被试对高、低权力目标对象的刻板印象评分的差异,并探讨自我卷入对权力刻板印象特质评分的影响。结果：①被试对高、低权力目标对象的刻板印象特质评分差异显著,高权力目标对象能力(而非才能)的得分显著高于低权力目标对象的得分,而热情和亲和的得分显著低于低权力目标对象的得分;②被试对目标对象的刻板印象特质评分受其自我卷入程度的影响,低自我卷入条件下能力、才能和亲和的评分显著低于高自我卷入条件下的评分。结论：在中国成人中存在权力刻板印象,呈现出"高权力目标对象-高能力、低热情,低权力目标对象-低能力、高热情"的特点;刻板印象特质评分受到知觉者自我卷入程度的影响。

Objective: To explore the stereotype of power in Chinese culture and the influence of self-involvement on the stereotype of power. Methods: 128 adult participants were studied in experiments which explored participants' stereotype of power on the objects of high-power and low-power, and then the influence of self-involvement on the stereotype of power was examined. Results: There were significant judgment differences of stereotype traits between the high-power people and the low-power people, in which the competence(not talent) score of high-power people was higher than the low-power people, but the warmth score of high-power people was lower than low-power people. Self-involvement affected the participants' judgment of stereotype traits. Conclusion: The stereotype of power exists in Chinese adults, that is a trend of "object of high power: high competence, low warmth, object of low power: low competence, high warmth"; Furthermore the judgment of stereotype traits is influenced by self-involvement of perceiver.

基金项目：

国家自然科学基金项目(31171003)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Tiedens LZ, Ellsworth PC, Mesquita B. Stereotypes aboutsentiments and status: Emotional expectations for high-andlow-status group members. Personality and Social Psychol-ogy Bulletin, 2000, 26: 560-574
2 Jost JT, Banaji MR, Nosek BA. Adecade of system justifica-tion theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and uncon-sious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology,2004, 25: 881-919
3 Fragale AR, Rosen B, Xu C, Merideth I. The higher theyare, the harder they fall: The effects of wrongdoer status onobserver punishment recommendations and intentionalityattributions. Organizational Behavior and Human DecisionProcesses, 2009, 108: 53-65
4 Russell AMT, Fiske ST. It's all relative: Competition andstatus drive interpersonal perception. European Journal ofSocial Psychology, 2008, 38: 1193-1201
5 Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick PS. Universal dimensions ofsocial perception: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cog-nitive Sciences, 2007, 11: 77-83
6 Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick PS, Xu J. A model of(oftenmixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respec-tively follow from perceived status and competition. Journalof Personality and Social psychology, 2002, 82(6): 878-902
7 张婍，冯江平，王二平. 群际威胁的分类及其对群体偏见的影响. 心理科学进展，2009，17(2)：473-480
8 Stephan WG, Stephan CW. An integrated theory of preju-dice. In Oskamp S. Reducing prejudice and discrimination:The claremont symposium on applied social psychology.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 2000
9 Ma Y, Han S. Self-face advantage is modulated by socialthreat-boss effect on self-face recognition. Journal of Ex-perimental Social Psychology, 2009, 45: 1048-1051
10 Andrews JC, Durvasula S, Akhter SH. A framework for co-nceptualizing and measuring the involvement construct inadvertising research. Journal of Advertising, 1990, 19(4):27-40
11 佐斌，温芳芳. 职业刻板印象：自我卷入与评价偏向. 中国临床心理学杂志，2011，19(2)：149-154
12 管健，程婕婷. 刻板印象内容模型的确认、测量及卷入的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志，2011，19(2)：184-191
13 张庆，王美芳. 社会判断内容的基本维度研究. 心理科学，2011，34(4)：899-904
14 钟毅平，陈海洪. 心理距离对道德行为判断的影响．心理学探新，2013，33(1)：43－46
15 Bar-Anan Y, Liberman N, Trope Y. The association bet-ween psychological distance and construal level: Evidencefrom an impicit association test. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology：General, 2006, 135(4): 609-622
16 侯东辉，郝兴昌. 高中生内隐和外显职业性别刻板印象关系．心理科学，2009，32(4)：850-853
17 Cuddy AJC, Fiske ST, Glick P. Warmth and competence asuniversal dimensions of social perception: The stereotypecontent model and the BIAS Map. Advances in Experimen-tal Social Psychology, 2008, 40: 61-147

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】