中国临床心理学杂志

创伤后成长量表在军校学员中的初步修订

作者：张月娟王进礼周喻张刚李茹段丽萨

分类号：R395.5

出版年,卷(期):页码：2013,21(3):389-392

摘要：

目的:在军校学员群体中初步修订创伤后成长量表,进行条目分析、探索并验证其因子结构。方法:将创伤后成长量表翻译成中文,施测于706名近几年经历各种创伤事件的军校学员。将样本按事件奇偶分半,样本1(n=353)用于探索性因素分析,样本2(n=353)用于验证性因素分析和信度检验。结果:①探索性因素分析抽取4个特征值大于1的因子(个人力量的改变、对生活的理解和欣赏、人际关系的改变、新的可能性),能解释总方差的56.37%。②验证性因素分析4因子模型,χ²/df=3.054,NNFI=0.88,CFI=0.90,GFI=0.89,IFI=0.90,RMSEA=0.076。③4因子结构的量表内部一致性信度α=0.902。结论:修订后的4因子结构量表信、效度检验基本达到心理测量学要求,可用于大学生群体创伤后成长的评估。

Objective: To revise Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) among Chinese military undergraduates, and to examine the factor structure of PTGI. Methods: PTGI was first translated into Chinese, and then was administrated to 706 military undergraduates who had experienced a significant negative life event during the past several years. Two subsam ples were split by odd and even: one(n=353) was examined with the Exploratory Factor Analysis(EFA), and the other(n= 353) was examined with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Results: ① EFA produced four factors with eigenvalues greater than one, accounting for 56.37% of the common variance. The factors were labeled change of personal strength, appreciation of life, change of relation to others, new possibilities. ②CFA indicated the 4 factor model(χ²/df=3.054，NNFI= 0.88，CFI=0.90，GFI=0.89，IFI=0.90，RMSEA=0.076) was superior to the original 5 factor model of PTGI. ③The internal consistency of the 4 factor model of PTGI was α=0.902. Conclusion: The validity and reliability of the revised version of PTGI is acceptable, It is applicable to trauma-related research.

基金项目：

天津市哲学社会科学基金(TJJX12-168)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Helgeson VS, Reynolds KA, Tomich PL. A meta-analyticreview of benefit finding and growth. Journal of Consultingand Clinical Psychology, 2006, 74(5): 797-816
2 Joseph S, Linley PA. Growth following adversity: Theoretical perspectives and implications for clinical practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 2006, 26: 1041-1053
3 Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. The posttraumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal ofTraumatic Stress, 1996, 9: 455-471
4 Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 1996, 15: 1-18
5 Taku K, Cann A, Calhoun LG, et al. The factor structure ofthe posttraumatic growth inventory: A comparison of fivemodel using confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 2008, 21: 158-164
6 Jocelyn A, Lee DD, Luxton GM, te al. Confirmatory factoranalysis of the posttraumatic growth Inventory with a sample of soldiers previously deployed in support of the Iraqand Afghanistan wars. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2010,66(7): 813-819
7 Levine SZ, Laufer A, Hamama RY, et al. Posttraumaticgrowth in adolescence: Examining its components and rela-tionship with PTSD. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 2008, 21:492-496
8 Powell S, Rosner R, Butollo W, et al. Posttraumatic growthafter war: A study with former refugees and displaced peo-ple in Sarajevo. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2003, 59:71-83
9 Ho SM, Chan CL, Ho RT. Posttraumatic growth in Chinesecancer survivors. Psychooncology, 2004, 13: 377-389
10 陈悦，甘怡群，黄淑慧，等. 创伤后成长量表在汶川地震灾民中的修订与初步应用. 中国临床心理学杂志，2012，20(3): 336-339
11 张倩，郑涌. 创伤后成长: 5.12 地震创伤的新视角. 心理科学进展，2009，17(3): 623-630
12 汪际，汪艳波，刘晓虹. 创伤后成长相关测评工具的研究进展. 中华护理杂志，2010，45(8): 758-760
13 涂阳军，陈建文. 创伤后成长: 概念与测量. 中国社会医学杂志，2009，26(5): 260-262

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】