中国临床心理学杂志

不同权力者人际敏感性的差异

作者：钟毅平¹ 张珊明¹ 2 陈芸¹

单位：1 湖南师范大学心理系长沙 410081
2 中南林业科技大学心理健康教育研究中心长沙 410004

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2013,21(1):62-65

摘要：

目的:探讨两种实验条件下不同权力者的人际敏感性差异。方法:实验一采用3(角色扮演启动权力:高权力组/低权力组/控制组)×2(性别:男/女)被试间实验设计对206名大学生进行人际敏感性测验。实验二对某企业91名高、低权力员工进行人际敏感性测验。结果:实验一:角色扮演的主效应显著,高权力组人际敏感性得分显著高于低权力组;性别的主效应、角色扮演和性别的交互效应均不显著。实验二:权力的主效应显著,高权力组人际敏感性得分显著高于低权力组得分;权力和个人权力感的交互作用接近显著,简单主效应显示,高个人权力感的高权力者人际敏感性显著高于高个人权力感的低权力者。结论:在角色扮演任务和实际工作情境中高权力者比低权力者更具有人际敏感性。

Objective: To explore the differences of interpersonal sensitivity between highpower people and lowpower people in two experimental conditions.Methods: In Experiment, 1,206 college participants in either a high or lowpower position or control condition interacted; In Experiment 2, 91 enterprise employees was measured by empathic accuracy paradigm.Results: In Experiment 1, A 3(leaders, control vs.assistants)×2(male vs.female) ANOVA yielded a significant main effect on interpersonal sensitivity, with high power people more interpersonally sensitive than low power people.There was no significant gender main effect, and no significant interaction effect.In Experiment 2, A 2 (highpower vs.lowpower)×2(male vs.female)×2(highpersonal sense of power vs.low personal sense of power) ANOVA showed a significant main effect on interpersonal sensitivity, with high power people more interpersonally sensitive than low power people.There was edge significant interaction effect between power and personal sense of power.Conclusion: Highpower individuals are more interpersonally sensitive than lowpower individuals in the roleplaying and in real life.

基金项目：

国家自然科学基金项目(31171003);湖南省教育厅重点研究项目(11A076)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 张珊明，钟毅平，罗伏生，等.人际敏感性的概念及其测量.中国临床心理学杂志，2012，20(5)：606-609
2 Snodgrass SE.Further effects of role versus gender on interpersonal sensitivity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992, 62(1): 154-158
3 Kenny DA, Horner C, Kashy, DA, et al.Consensus at zero acquaintance: Ｒeplication, behavioral cues, and stability.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992, 62(1):88-97
4 Ickes W, Stinson L, Bissonnette V, et al.Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990, 59(4): 730-742
5 Overbeck JR, Park B.When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 81(4): 549-565
6 Schmid Mast M, Jonas K, Hall JA.Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: The phenomenon and its why and when.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2009, 97(5): 835-850
7 Galinsky AD, Magee JC, Inesi ME, et al.Power and perspectives not taken.Psychological Science, 2006, 17 (12):1068-1074
8 Kenny DA, Snook A, Boucher EM, et al.Interpersonal sensitivity, status, and stereotype accuracy.Psychological Science, 2010, 21(12): 1735-1739
9 林怡秀，李怡青.非语言敏感度：权力差异与不同社会角色期待的效果探讨.教育与心理研究，2011，34(1)：55-77
10 Smith PK, Jostmann NB, Galinsky AD, et al.Lacking power impairs executive functions.Psychological Science, 2008,19(5): 441-447
11 Smith PK, Trope Y.You focus on the forest when you' re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2006, 97(5): 578-596
12 Guinote A.Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2007, 43(5): 685-697
13 Ambady N, Gray HM.On being sad and mistaken: Mood effects on the accuracy of thin-slice judgments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 83(4): 947-961
14 Berdahl JL, Martorana P.Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion.Euro pean Journal of Social Psychology, 2006, 36(4): 495-509
15 Chepenik LG, Cornew LA, Farah MJ.The influence of sad mood on cognition.Emotion, 2007, 7(4): 802-811
16 Anderson C, Galinsky AD.Power, optimism, and risk taking.Euroean Journal of Social Psychology, 2006, 36(4):511-536
17 刘新丰.特质 —角色权力匹配对自我表现及自评—他评一致性的影响.西南大学硕士毕业论文，2010
18 Mayer JD, Salovey P, Caruso DR.Emotional intelligence: Theory, findings, and implications.Psychological Inquiry,2004, 15(3): 197-215
19 Byron K, Terranova S, Nowicki S.Nonverbal emotion recognition and salespersons: Linking ability to perceived and actual success.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2007,37(11): 2600-2619
20 Elfenbein HA, Foo MD, White J, et.al.Reading your counterpart: The benefit of emotion recognition accuracy for effectiveness in negotiation.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,2007, 31(4): 205-223

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】