中国临床心理学杂志

人际环形模型对心理病理的解释建构

作者：王硕¹ 周雅² 刘翔平¹ Aaron L.Pincus³

单位：1. 北京师范大学心理学院北京 100875
2. 香港中文大学教育心理系香港
3. Department of Psychology The Pennsylvania State University University Park PA 16802 USA

关键词：人际环形模型心理病理人际病理可塑性人际情境

分类号：R395.2

出版年,卷(期):页码：2014,22(4):641-644

摘要：

DSM-5对人格障碍的诊断凸显了人际的重要性。人际环形模型是当代人际领域核心成果,它以掌控/联结两大元动机作为横纵轴来建立圆环。围绕环形模型产生了或静态或动态的诸多概念,用以描述人际功能的适应与否。近年愈来愈多病理与临床研究引入环形模型及相关概念,对心理及人格障碍的内在机制、表型表达、评估及治疗予以深入解析。未来研究可尝试更新的人际动力评估方法,如电脑操纵杆法、事件关联记录法,或纳入文化背景因素,来进-步发掘人际功能在心理病理及人格大背景中的意义。

The released DSM-5 has highlighted the crucial role of interpersonal functioning in the pathology of personality disorder.Contemporary interpersonal theory hase been developed into an extensively-validated model for conceptualizing and evaluating interpersonal functioning, namely Interpersonal Circumplex(IPC).The IPC relies on two meta-concepts in human behaviors labeled as"agency"and"communion"to reflect individual differences across a host of interpersonal constructs.A variety of concepts have been derived from the IPC, including static interpersonal themes and dynamic interpersonal interactions.Over the last decade, the IPC and related concepts have been gradually integrated into the studies of psychopathology and psychotherapy, to explore the relationship of interpersonal functioning with the dynamic mechanism,phenotypic expression, assessment and treatment of psychological or personality disorders.Further research should try to develop new interpersonal dynamics assessment methods, and take into account the influence of culture differences on the link between interpersonal functioning and psychopathology.

基金项目：

教育部人文社会科学-般项目“抑郁大学生的人际认知特点及干预”(13YJA190009);国家科技支撑计划项目“基于学校家庭-体化的纵向心理健康教育和心理疏导的应用示范研究”(2012BAI36B03)资助

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic; and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Arlington. 2013. 761- 781.
[2] Pincus AL. Some comments on nomology, diagnostic proc-ess, and narcissistic personality disorder in the DSM-5 pro- posal for personality and personality disorder disorders. Per-sonality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2011, 2: 41-53.
[3] Horowitz LM. Interpersonal foundations of psychopathology Washington, DC:American Psychological Association, 20043.
[4] Sullivan HS. The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York, NY: Norton, 1953.
4 Sullivan HS. The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York, NY: Norton, 1953.
[5] Anchin JC, Pincus AL. Evidence-based interpersonal psychotherapy with personality disorders: Theory, components, and strategies. In Magnavita JJ. Evidence-based treatment of personality dysfunction: Principles, methods, and processes. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC,2010. 113-166.
[6] Ansell EB, Grilo CM, White ME. Examining the interpersonal model of binge eating and loss of control over eating in women. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 2012, 45: 43-50.
[7] Pincus AL, Lukowitsky MR, Wright AGC. The interpersonal nexus of personality and psychopathology. In Millon T, Krueger RF, Simonsen E. Contemporary diections in psychopathology: Scientific foundations of the DSM-5 and ICD-11. Guilford Press: New York, NY, 2010. 523-552.
[8] Wright AGC, Pincus AL, Hopwood CJ, et al. An interpersonal analysis of pathological personality traits in DSM-5. Assessment, 2012, 19: 263-275.
[9] Wiggins JS. An informal history of the interpersonal circum-plex tradition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1996, 66: 217-233.
[10] Benjamin LS. Interpersonal diagnosis and treatment of personality disorders. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 1996.
[11] Pincus AL, Gurtman MB, Ruiz MA. Structural analysis of social behavior(SASB): Circumplex analyses and structural relations with the interpersonal circle and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74: 1629-1645.
[12] Gurtman MB, Pincus AL. Interpersonal adjective scales: Confirmation of circumplex structure from multiple perspec-tives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2000, 26: 374-384.
[13] Wiggins JS, Trapnell P, Phillips N. Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the revised interpersonal adjective scales(IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research, l988, 23: 5l7-530.
[14] Pincus AL. The interpersonal circumplex and the interpersonal theory: Perspectives on personality and its pathology. In Strack S, Lorr M. Differentiating normal and abnormal personality. Springer: New York, NY, l994. ll4-l36.
[15] O Connor BP, Dyce JA. Rigid and extreme: A geometric representation of personality disorders in fi ve-factor model space. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 200l, 8l: lll9-ll30.
[16] Tracey TJG. Interpersonal rigidity and complementarity. Journal of Research in Personality, 2005, 39: 592-6l4.
[17] Horowitz LM, Wilson KR, Turan B, et al. How interpersonal motives clarify the meaning of interpersonal behavior: A revised circumplex model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2006, l0: 67-86.
[18] Widiger TA, Smith GT. Personality and psychopathology. In John OP, Robins R, Pervin LA. Handbook of personality: Theory and research. Guilford Press: New York, NY, 2008. 743-769.
[19] Pincus AL, Hopwood CJ. A contemporary interpersonal model of personality pathology and personality disorder. In Wi-diger TA. Oxford Handbook of Personality Disorders. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, 20l2. 372-398.
[20] Salzer S, Pincus AL, Winkelbach C, et al. Interpersonal subtypes and change of interpersonal problems in the treatment of patients with generalized anxiety disorder: A pilot study. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, and Training,20ll, 48: 304-3l0.
[21] Klein DN, Kotov R, Bufferd SJ. Personality and depression: Explanatory models and review of the evidence. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 20ll, 7: 269-295.
[22] Pincus AL, Przeworski A, Yamasaki A, et al. Interpersonal pathoplasticity in generalized anxiety disorder: A cluster analytic replication. Paper presented at the society for interpersonal theory and research. Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2005.
[23] Kasoff MB. Interpersonal subtypes of generalized anxiety disorder: Derivation and differentiation in patterns of adult attachment and psychiatric comorbidity. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 2002, (l2-b): 62.
[24] Kachin KE, Newman MG, Pincus AL. An interpersonal problem approach to the division of social phobia subtypes. Behavior Therapy, 200l, 32: 479-50l.
[25] Cain NM, Pincus AL, Ansell EB. Narcissism at the crossroads: Phenotypic description of pathological narcissism across clinical theory, social/personality psychology, and psychiatric diagnosis. Clinical Psychology Review, 2008. 28:638-656.
26 Ram N, Gerstorf D. Time-structured and net intraindividual variability: Tools for examining the development of dynamic characteristics and processes. Psychology and Aging, 2009, 24:778-79l.
[27] Moskowitz DS, Zuroff DC. Flux, pulse, and spin: Dynamic additions to the personality lexicon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004, 86: 880-893.
[28] Ram N, Conroy DE, Pincus AL, et al. Tethering theory to method: Using measures of intraindividual variability to operationalize individuals dynamic characteristics. In Hancock G, Harring J. Advances in longitudinal modeling in the social and behavioral sciences. Information Age Publishing: Charlotte, NC, 20l2. 8l-ll0.
[29] Pincus AL. A contemporary integrative interpersonal theory of personality disorders. In Clarkin J, Lenzenweger M. Major theories of personality disorder. Guilford Press: New York,NY, 2005. 282-33l.
[30] Russell JJ, Moskowitz DS, Zuroff DC, et al. Stability and variability of affective experience and interpersonal behavior in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2007, ll6: 578-588.
[31] Mischel W, Shoda Y. The situated person. In Mesquita B, Feldman-Barrett L, Smith ER. The mind in context. Guilford Press: New York, NY, 20l0. l49-l73.
[32] Kammrath LK, Scholer AA. The cognitive-affective processing system. In Tennen HA, Suls JM. Handbook of psycholo-gy—Volume 5: Personality and social psychology. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 20l3. l6l-l82.
[33] Fournier MA, Moskowitz DS, Zuroff DC. The interpersonal signature. Journal of Research in Personality, 2009, 43: l55-l62.
[34] Sadikaj G, Russell JJ, Moskowitz DS, et al. Affect dysregul-ation in individuals with borderline personality disorder: Persistence and interpersonal triggers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 20l0, 92: 490-500.
[35] Krueger RF, Skodo AE, Livesley WJ, et al. Synthesizing dimensional and categorical approaches to personality disorders: refining the research agenda for DSM-IV Axis II. In Helzer JE, Kraemer HC, Krueger RF, et al. Dimensional approaches to diagnostic classification. Refining the research agenda for DSM-V. American Psychiatric Association:Washington, DC, 2008.
[36] Pincus AL, Sadler P, Woody E, et al. Assessing interpersonal dynamics. In Hopwood CJ, Bornstein RF. Multi-method clinical assessment. Guilford Press: New York, NY, in press.
[37] Wu L, Roche MJ, Dowgwillo EA, et al. A Chinese Translation of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems—Short Cir-cumplex. Journal of Personality Assessment, in press.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】