中国临床心理学杂志

中文版恢复需要量表信效度的初步研究

单位：1 东南大学学习科学研究中心南京 210096
2 阿城区第六中学哈尔滨 150300
3 珠海市第十五小学珠海 519000

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2014,22(5):839-841

摘要：

目的:对英文恢复需要量表进行初步修订,并检验所修订量表的信效度。方法:采用中文翻译的恢复需要量表对554名工作者进行测试,检测该量表各项目的区分度,分半信度和内部一致性信度,使用验证性因素分析检验其结构效度,用职场疲劳量表、工作倦怠量表和健康状况调查量表检测其效标效度。结果:1该量表的内部一致性信度为0.78,分半信度为0.77;2量表单因素结构的拟合指数良好,RMSEA、GFI、NFI、CFI和IFI值分别为0.047、0.97、0.96、0.98和0.98;3该量表与其他疲劳量表或分量表得分的相关均达到了P<0.001的显著水平。结论:修订后量表符合单因素的理论模型,信度和效度指标符合心理测量学的要求,可作为短期工作疲劳的测量工具。

Objective:To revise the need for recovery scale for workers, and test its reliability and validity. Methods:A sample of 554 workers in a wide series of working fields was recruited to test the discrimination, reliability and validity of the scale. The criteria were the occupational burnout inventory, the Maslach burnout inventory and the short form-36 health survey. Results:The item discrimination of the revised scale was acceptable. Its internal consistency and split-half reliabil ity were 0.78 and 0.77. The revised scale had one-factor model with better fitting indexes of confirmatory factor analysis, RMSEA=0.047, GFI=0.97, CFI=0.96, IFI=0.98. The scale showed good correlations with the criteria involved in fatigue. Conclusion:The revised scale has satisfactory reliability and validity and meets the demands of psychometrics. It could be used in the related researches.

基金项目：

江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目(CXLX12_0122);教育部新世纪人才支持计划(NCTE-08-122)的资助

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Sluiter JK, De Croon EM, Meijman TF, et al. Need for recovery from work related fatigue and its role in the development and prediction of subjective health complaints. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2003, 60(1): 62-70
2 Kuiper JI, van der Beek AJ, Meijman TF. Psychosomatic complaints and unwinding of sympathoadrenal activation after work. Stress and Health, 1998, 14(1): 7-12
3 Kwakkel G, van Dijk GM, Wagenaar RC. Accuracy of physical and occupational therapists' early predictions of recovery after severe middle cerebral artery stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 2000, 14(1): 28-41
4 Jansen NW, Kant I, van den Brandt PA, et al. Need for recovery in the working population: Description and associations with fatigue and psychological distress. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2002, 9(4): 322-340
5 Van Veldhoven M, Meijman TF. Het meten van psychosociale arbeidsbelasting met een vragenlijst: De vragenlijst beleving en beoordeling van de arbeid(VBBA). Amsterdam: Nederlands Instituut voor Arbeidsomstandigheden, 1994
6 Sluiter JK, Van der Beek AJ, Frings-Dresen MHW. The influence of work characteristics on the need for recovery and experienced health: a study on coach drivers. Ergonomics, 1999, 42(4): 573-583
7 De Croon EM, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW. Need for recovery predicts sickness absence: a 2-years prospective cohort-study in truck drivers. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 2003, 55(4): 331-339
8 叶婉榆，郑雅文，陈美如，等. 职场疲劳量表的编制与信效度分析. 台湾卫志，2008，27(5)：349-364
9 李超平，时勘. 分配公平与程序公平对工作倦怠的影响. 心理学报，2003，35(5)：677-684
10 李鲁，王红妹，沈毅. SF-36 健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试. 中华预防医学杂志，2002，36(2)：109-113
11 Brugha TS, Bebbington PE, MacCarthy B, et al. Gender, social support and recovery from depressive disorders: a prospective clinical study. Psychological Medicine, 1990, 20(1): 147-156
12 Mohren D, Jansen N, Kant IJ. Need for recovery from work in relation to age: a prospective cohort study. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 2010, 83(5): 553-561
13 Jansen N, Kant I, van Amelsvoort L, et al. Need for recovery from work: Evaluating short-term effects of working hours, patterns and schedules. Ergonomics, 2003, 46(7): 664-680

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】