中国临床心理学杂志

Psychometric Properties of the Short-form Version of the Cognitive Style Questionnaire

作者：CHEN Jian¹ ZHOU Li-hua² YAN Liang-shi³ SU Lin-yan⁴

单位：1. Development Research Center of Undergraduates  Hunan Institute of Technology  Hengyang 421002  China
2. Department of Education Science  Hengyang Normal University  Hengyang 421002 China
3. School of Education Science  Hunan Normal University  Changsha 410081  China
4. Mental Health Institute of the Second Xiangya Hospital  Central South University  Changsha 410011  China

关键词：Cognitive style Hopelessness depression Self-compassion

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2014,22(6):1046-1049

摘要：

目的:检验中文版认知方式问卷(短版)的信效度。方法:用中文版认知方式问卷(短版)、无望抑郁问卷、自悯量表对415名大学生进行测量,对其中55名大学生四周后重测中文版认知方式问卷(短版)。结果:中文版认知方式问卷(短版)的Cronbachα系数为0.77,分半信度为0.67,四周的重测信度为0.85;探索性因素分析得一个特征根大于1的因子,解释总变异的40.32%;中文版认知方式问卷(短版)的得分与无望抑郁问卷的得分显著正相关,与自悯量表的得分显著负相关。结论:中文版认知方式问卷(短版)具有较好的信效度,可以用来测量我国大学生的认知方式。

This study examined the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Short-Form version of the Cognitive Style Questionnaire(CCSQ-SF). 415 Chinese undergraduates(306 men, 109 women; mean age=19.2 years, SD=1.04) completed the CCSQ-SF along with the Hopelessness Depression Symptom Questionnaire(HDSQ) and Self-Compassion Scale(SCS). The internal consistency of the CCSQ-SF was high(Cronbach alpha=0.77), and the split-half coefficient and test-retest correlation after 4 weeks were satisfactory(r=0.67 and 0.85, respectively). Pearson correlations of the scores on the CCSQ-SF with the criterion measures(HDSQ and SCS) were in the expected directions. The CCSQ-SF is appropriate for measuring negative cognitive style among Chinese students.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Abramson LY, Metalsky GI, Alloy LB. Hopelessness depres-sion: a theory-based subtype of depression. Psychological Review, 1989, 96: 358-372
2 Alloy LB, Abramson LY, Hogan ME, et al. The temple-wisconsin Cognitive Vulnerability to Depression(CVD) pro-ject: Lifetime history of Axis I psychopathology in individu-als at high and low cognitive risk for depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2000, 109: 403-418
3 Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1970, 1: 185-216
4 Chen J, Zhou LH, Yan LS, Su LY. Reliability and validity of the cognitive style questionnaire in Chinese college stud-ents. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2013, 21: 213-216
5 Chen J, Yan LS, Zhou LH. Reliability and validity of Chi-nese version of self-compassion scale. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2011, 19: 734-736
6 Chris A, Oralando S, Jordan S, Amy M. Pathways to depres-sive symptoms in young adults: Examine affective, self-regulatory, and cognitive vulnerability factors. Psychological Reports, 2012, 111: 335-348
7 Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurements, 1960, 20: 141-151
8 Meins E, McCarthy-Jones S, Fernyhough C, et al. Assessing negative cognitive style: Development and validation of a short-form version of the Cognitive Style Questionnaire. Per-sonality and Individual Differences, 2012, 52: 581-585
9 Metalsky GI, Joiner TE. The hopelessness depression symp-tom questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1997, 21: 359-384
10 Neff KD. The development and validation of a scale to mea-sure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2003, 2(3): 223-250
11 Wallace SH, Brislin RW. Evaluation language translations: Experiments on three assessment methods. Journal of App-lied Psychology, 1973, 57: 328-334
12 Wang SX, Zheng RM, Wu JL, Liu XH. The application of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction in medicine. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2014, 5: 947-950
13 Yi H, Feng ZZ. The reliability and validity of Chinese ver-sion of HDSQ. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2008, 16: 18-21

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】